Wednesday, March 4, 2026

We're Just Trying to Be Friendly (2002)

2001 Year-End Ballot

1. "Around the World," ATC: This stood in stark relief to everything else on pop radio in 2001. Destiny's Child, Alicia Keyes, Jay-Z, all that interchangeably dismal Staind/Creed/Incubus piffle--everyone's a showstopper, dramatizing and declaiming over every square inch of song, self-appointed legends the moment they get a record on the air. (No less true of at least a couple of the people below, but I found myself fleeing from a greater percentage of radio swagger this year than at any time in recent memory.) "Around the World" was the only music to satisfy my new rule that the best song in any given year must be touched by the hand of "You Showed Me" by the Byrds: mysterious, luminous, melancholy, evanescent, serene. ATC's singer spends much of the time explaining her inability to explain anything ("I don't know what to say--oh not another word, just la-la-la-la-la..."), but precipitating her speechlessness is one of the greatest subjects of all for pop music, a disruptive but liberating encounter with "the radio playing songs that I have never heard." In the first verse she hears them, in the second she sits in an empty room waiting to hear them again. No matter how cataclysmic the effect, there's never explicit verbalization of what is better left to the *la-la-la-la-la*s and their matching Europop synthesizer flourish. Even the big Martha Wash/Robin S voice that pops up at the end, which 10 years ago would have been front and center, is mixed way into the background. A deceptively complicated record that is as pure in its way as the Velvet Underground's "Rock and Roll" or the Modern Lovers' "Roadrunner."

2. "Get Ur Freak On (Nelly Furtado Remix)," Missy Elliot: In another year, in a different frame of mind, this would have topped my list. The regular version is the most bizarre mainstream hip-hop I've heard since Busta Rhymes' "Woo-Hah!", the remix (easily identifiable by the helpful line "Reeeeee-mix!") weirder still. As freak artifacts go, this one conjures up Tod Browning and the Mothers of Invention as much as it does Chic.

3. "Round and Round," Hi-Tek: Good title for an R&B trance-out. The round-and-round at first refers to voices in the singer's head, then settles into a break-up-to-make-up kind of round-and-round. Towards the end there's a dramatic announcement that "Today I made up my mind to get away," but nothing's ever resolved and the song trails off still going round and round. Not the Ninja Turtle group from the late '80s, which was Hi Tek 3, unless it's one of those remnants-of-the-Drifters-type touring companies.

4. "Days of the Week," Stone Temple Pilots: It's pretty funny how this group is so entrenched on both "hard" and "modern" rock stations, the two commercial radio formats that are the most sanctimonious about their closed-off worlds. If either listenership ever clues into the fact that they're harboring the new Monkees, I'm sure excommunication will follow immediately. For what it's worth, I don't know anyone who operates on the calendar described in "Days of the Week." "Back from the dead" on Monday? It's been a long time since these people held real jobs.

5. "Since I Left You," Avalanches: A bookend for Hi-Tek above, insofar as it's exactly the kind of half-remembered reverie I imagine as the inspiration for "Around the World." Like Barbara Mason's "Yes, I'm Ready," which the vocal reminds me of and which always makes me swoon when I hear it today. It takes a lot of technological ingenuity to get such authentically faraway ambience out of some spliced-together samples. I wish it were an actual song, especially one I'd gotten to know off the radio, instead of from a mixed tape made by a friend. I guess those things matter to me, which is partly why I connect with "Around the World" more deeply.

6. "The Plumb Song," Snow: To introduce the concept of probability to grade-school kids, you begin with familiar vocabulary applied to everyday examples: it's unlikely, though far from impossible, that we'll see any snow in April, but it's extremely likely, though not 100% certain, that we'll get some in March. If you'd asked me three years ago about the probability of Snow in 2001, I would have placed the likelihood well towards the low end of the spectrum. More improbable still, he's added one of those airy, magisterial highway songs to my country's national canon: Gordon Lightfoot's "Carefree Highway," Bachman-Turner Overdrive's "Roll on Down the Highway," Tom Cochrane's "Life Is a Highway"...well, maybe it's a two-song canon. "The Plumb Song"'s most brilliant line comes right at the start, where Snow pays homage to his Hendrix/Allman/Clapton roots by asking someone to "hand me that guitar." And thus the legend can finally be told: Deep down in Jane and Finch, across from Albion/Way back up in the woods among the evergreen/There stood a few apartments lined up in a row/Where lived a country boy, went by the name of Snow. Etc., etc.

7. "You," Lucy Pearl: "Nephew Snoop," as he's referred to here (by somebody clearly much younger than he is--confusing), is about thirty times scarier in John Singleton's otherwise clumsy Baby Boy than Ben Kingsley's affected Frank Booth imitation in Sexy Beast. Kingsley has a big 20-minute buildup and a shaved head, and he more or less nags people into submission (he's more annoying than frightening); Snoop's got the look. On "You" he takes on a much more difficult supporting role as a marriage-minded romantic who advises "time brings change."

8. "Purple Hills," D12: I'm not sure if Eminem's supposed to be an actual walking timebomb, liable to say or do something indefensible at any given moment, or whether he just plays around with that idea in order to ridicule anyone gullible enough to believe it. I'm a year behind, that was 2000's big question--lots of close analysis that tried to figure him out, just like everyone used to try to figure out Axl Rose--and to that end, "Purple Hills" was probably insufficiently self-involved for critics fascinated by all the Slim Shady legerdemain. But I'm convinced that "Purple Hills" has it all over "My Name Is," "The Real Slim Shady," and "Stan" in one department: it's full- bodied and instantaneously catchy, musically alive in a way that Eminem's usual plinking around isn't. Eminem's isn't even the most interesting voice here, which belongs to the Humpty Hump soundalike who turns "sumpin', sumpin', sumpin'" into a perfect vocal ellipsis. As far as Eminem's neuroses go, one of my favourite lines in Ghost World was Thora Birch's explanation of why she chose to do a portrait of Don Knotts for her summer art class: "Because I like Don Knotts." I do too. Now *there* was a guy with "issues."

9. "My Way," Limp Bizkit: The first Fred to make my year-end list since Right Said Fred in 1991. This Fred's a few evolutionary steps backwards in terms of cartoonishness, a leap back to Freds Grandy, Flintstone, and Mertz, but "My Way" always caught my attention, and sometimes even nailed my mood, in whatever setting I heard it this year. It has an odd minor-key coloration that's almost beautiful in spots, making the standard soft-part-now-here-comes-the-loud-part gimmick seem not so hokey as a result. Another highway song, only here the highway is where you're banished to if you don't accommodate Fred Durst's every last wish. And I'm sure that at this point in his life, Durst is a guy who faces no end of resistance from the people he surrounds himself with on a day-to-day basis.

10. "Family Affair," Mary J. Blige: I have a daily thing in my class where we spend five minutes commemorating the birthday or death day of somebody famous, or the anniversary of a famous event. On Chuck Berry's birthday I always play "Come On," with some or all of the lyrics written on the board, and I talk about how in his other songs he'd sometimes make up funny words like "botheration." This year, that prompted Shauna to point out that Mary J. Blige sang about "hateration" in her new song. Well, she probably had Chuck Berry in the back of her mind when she wrote that, I said, a bit of blufferation on my part--"Family Affair" mentions 8-Tracks, too, so for all I know its rhymes owe more to Chuck Barris. Perhaps we'll revisit Mary J. Blige's influences on March 15, Sly Stone's birthday, and I'll tell the class all about the mud and the blood and the importance of punctuality.

I'm casting a bonus vote for my Dad, who recently asked if I was "still writing for the Village People." It was his greatest malapropism since my parents were apartment-hunting a few years ago and he mentioned a place as being "$850, including utensils." I was enjoying the moment too much to really answer him, so yes, Dad, I am, now and again, but I try to save all my best stuff for the Silver Convention.


Over, Under, Sideways, Down (2001)

Writing in his annual Baseball Book after the '94 strike, Bill James identified four players whose Hall of Fame chances he felt had been most adversely affected by the shortened season: David Cone, Jimmy Key, Will Clark, and Gregg Jeffries. His reasoning was that they were all marginal candidates in the midst of career years (or, in Clark's case, a return to form), and that by season's end they would have positioned themselves as having a credible shot at Cooperstown.

Even at the time, I thought he was wrong about Cone. The strike actually helped Cone, I thought, by stopping the season at a point where it was hard to make a logical case for anyone other than him winning the Cy Young. The vote was probably closer than it should have been--Cone edged Key 108-96--but he did win, and who knows whether he would have been overtaken by either Key or Randy Johnson had the season been played out. So even though the strike did cost Cone a few career wins and a 20-win season, the Cy Young that it guaranteed him was a better-than-even trade-off in terms of his HOF resume.

With the benefit of hindsight, I imagine James would agree that in the end, the strike didn't much affect the chances of the other three, either. Key and Clark remain borderline candidates after their retirement--Key better than borderline, Clark a lot less--and whatever they would have done for the remainder of '94 wouldn't have made much difference either way, including a Cy Young for Key. Jeffries declined rapidly after '94, and he was out of baseball by the time he turned 33. The timing of Jeffries' deterioration makes it tempting to wonder if the strike had some deeper cataclysmic affect on him that went beyond the 60 lost games, but I don't know what that would have been.

Ever since James's comments, I've gotten into the habit of looking at each season as a kind of market indicator on various players' HOF chances. (If you've ever been silly enough to get caught up in card collecting, a world in which a player's entire being eventually rests on whether or not he makes it into Cooperstown, you'll appreciate that "market indicator" is meant in the literal sense.) By July, as I scan the newspaper's stats page every Tuesday, I'm guided by an awareness of which players have solidified their HOF candidacies, who's in trouble, who's on cruise control, who's barely hanging on, and who may be warranting a serious look for the first time. It's like each name is shadowed by little arrow in the margin, pointing up, down, or sideways.

Some thoughts coming out of the 2001 season.

---------------------

WHO HAS IMPROVED HIS HOF CHANCES THE MOST THIS YEAR? Jim Thome. Thome had the foundation of a HOF career going into 2001--233 HR at age 30, four 100-run and 100-RBI seasons each, excellent career SA and OBA, and a surviving mainstay on one of the three best teams of his era--but it had all been accomplished in the shadow of Belle, Ramirez, and the rest of the Indians' revolving big-name cast. But he's going to come out of 2001 with a) an excellent chance at 500 HR (somewhere around 285 at age 31), b) a 50-HR season (not the benchmark that it was 10 years ago, granted, but still a formidable plateau), c) a possible MVP (though I'm pulling for Alomar myself), and d) a career OPS (on-base + slugging) that was already in the Top 20 of all time and now moves into the Top 15. If he can continue playing well for another seven or eight years, I'd say his HOF prospects are very good.

I don't think anyone else has broken through as convincingly as Thome, although I can see a few cases where 2001 has gotten some players back on track. Juan Gonzalez seemingly had room to spare on his HOF resume going into this season, and to that extent his bid for a third MVP is just another exclamation mark to a career that was already a lock. But after his desultory year in Detroit--similar to his falloff in '94, the key difference being he was 30 last year instead of 25--I sensed he was at a potentially critical juncture; if he had not come back healthy this year, or if he had struggled through another off-year, I could see where it might have been the beginning of a slow drift into Canseco-like instability. Barring catastrophe, though, Gonzalez again looks like a first-ballot cinch.

Craig Biggio has rebounded well from his shortened 2000 season, and it again appears that he'll get some overdue attention with induction into Cooperstown. He's doing most everything he was doing year-in and year-out before last year's injury: he's going to finish the year with a .300 average, 100+ runs, and 20 HR, and the Astros look to be going to the postseason. He's not hitting as many doubles as he used to, and he doesn't run anymore, but he's probably about 85-90% of the way back. If he can keep going for another two seasons at this level, he should be fine.

Edgar Martinez and Rafael Palmeiro have strengthened what were fairly solid HOF bids already. Statistically speaking, both are having subpar years by their own standards: Edgar will likely finish with his lowest batting average since '94, while Palmeiro's season will join '97 as his least productive in the past decade. But just in terms of bulk numbers, they both keep piling it on: another .300/20 HR/100 RBI season for Edgar, another 40 HR and 100 RBI for Palmeiro. Maybe even more important to Martinez is the fact that, Ichiro notwithstanding, he is finally the Mariners' resident superstar, and in a season where it just happens that they're going to win 110 games. If Seattle continues their dominance in the postseason, Martinez's candidacy will be that much stronger.

Mariano Rivera is starting to look more and more credible. He'll finish this year with 210 saves before he turns 32, giving him a pretty good shot at 400 if his arm holds up (with a pitcher, a little like saying if he continues to jump out into traffic without getting run over). His career E.R.A. may drop below 2.60. But impressive stats are commonplace with relievers--statistically, you could probably make almost as good a case for Rob Nenn (exactly one day older than Rivera), who has a higher E.R.A. but an extra 50 saves. Rivera's edge is that I keep thinking they're going to have to induct at least a couple of core Yankees from the late '90s dynasty, and past Jeter, Rivera's emerging as the next best candidate. I'm still not sure how history will view Bernie Williams, who held his ground this year; coming out of the era of gargantuan offensive numbers, Williams will probably suffer in the end for being too well-rounded and not eye-catching enough in any one of the big Triple Crown stats. I've seen Pettitte's name put forth by New York-based writers, but his surprising staying power aside, I just don't see a Hall of Fame career taking shape.

Fred McGriff and Jose Canseco may have done the bare minimum to revive their fading chances, which is essentially to buy themselves the two more years they each need for a shot at 500 HR. McGriff was having a very good season in Tampa Bay, but he's struggled since joining the Cubs; for the year he should end up somewhere around .285/25/90, leaving him with 440 HR at age 37. I'd be surprised if there's another 60 HR left in him, but if he's playing full-time somewhere next year, he's still got a shot. Canseco, meanwhile, has been playing well across town; he'll finish with 460 HR with a year's jump on McGriff, so his chance of reaching 500 would seem somewhat better if he can hook up with somebody for next year. I'm not sure it matters, though; Canseco could very well end up being the first guy to hit 500 HR and not get elected anyway. If it happens, he won't be the last.

WHO HAS HURT HIS HOF CHANCES THE MOST THIS YEAR? In the space of a year, I think it's easier to help your chances than hurt them. Anyone who goes into the season as a decent-or-better HOF candidate is already putting together a career that should be able to withstand an off-year. Especially with players in mid-career or earlier, there's always time to bounce back--again, Gonzalez's 2000 and 1994 seasons being good examples. So I wouldn't make too much of Frank Thomas's write-off season at 33; he did so much so early in his career, he just needs to get back in the lineup in 2002 and put in another four or five reasonably productive seasons. (Thomas is managing to turn a ten-lap lead into a photo finish. At the time, I didn't think his two MVPs would ultimately have much bearing on his future stroll into the HOF, not when it looked like he'd be going in as competition for Ruth and Williams as the most statistically imposing hitter ever; it now looks like those two MVPs might actually save his candidacy in the end.)

Having said that, I think there are three or four guys who took a hit this year. The most obvious--though you may have forgotten about him already, not having played a game in 2001--is Albert Belle, whose chances for the HOF went from probably 90% to something approaching nil. Coincidentally, in the year of Kirby Puckett's induction, Belle was forced into retirement at a point virtually identical to Puckett. If you compare the two, their batting lines give a huge advantage to Belle. But the '90s weren't the '80s in terms of offensive levels, Albert surely wasn't Kirby in the public relations department, and Belle will instead join Joe Jackson as the greatest hitter not in Cooperstown.

Mo Vaughn and Harold Baines, who were pretty marginal candidates anyway, are both close to officially dead. Vaughn will presumably be back next year, but he'll be 34 and still sitting at 299 HR. He's got a decent shot at 400-450, but that won't be worth anything down the road. Harold won't be back, so he'll finish about 100 hits shy of the 3,000 that, as with Canseco, might not have put him in anyway.

Among guys who actually played this year, I sense that Mike Mussina took a step backwards. He's pitched pretty well: his numbers aren't all that different from Clemens'--better SO/BB ratio, comparable E.R.A. and H/9--but Roger has gotten all the run support, giving him a 17-1 record as opposed to Mussina's 12-10. And that's the point: in signing with the Yankees, I thought that it would have been Mussina having the flashy season where his W-L record exceeded his (generally excellent) peripheral stats, that it would have been him going 22-4 and finally winning a Cy Young. He's not out of the running yet--he'll go into 2002 with 160 wins at age 33, and a career winning pct. still close to .650--but he's going to need a couple of those flashy seasons soon; he hasn't won 20 even once.

WHO'S ON CRUISE CONTROL AT THE MOMENT? Everybody else, I guess. Cruise control is a good thing. Griffey, Piazza, Bagwell, and Pudge all had varying degrees of subpar years, but they're in anyway, so I can't see that 2001 will make any difference. Ditto, to a lesser extent, Glavine. I'm sure some people would go with Alomar over Thome as this year's breakthrough candidate, but only if you haven't been paying attention. Alomar's been a leading HOF candidate for years, and the biggest question remaining with him at this point is how high he'll end up on the all-time hits list; eighth, I'd say, behind Yaz but ahead of Molitor. (Alomar also has a reasonable chance to become the first second baseman ever to total 5,000 career bases; he rates a 28% chance using James's "Favorite Toy" formula, and a 47% chance of eclipsing Hornsby's current record of 4,712.) Luis Gonzalez, Curt Schilling, Moises Alou, Shawn Green, and Jason Giambi have all been terrific this year, but I still don't see any of them as even longshots yet--Giambi, maybe. As for the two Colorado guys, Walker and Helton, I'm sidestepping them altogether. I just don't know how much weight future HOF voters are going to give to the freakshow aspect of Coors Field. 2300 AB into his career, Todd Helton is sitting on the fourth-highest slugging average in history, behind only Ruth, Williams, and Gehrig; at home he's like an even better version of Ruth, on the road his career stats are close to Fred McGriff's. So I don't know what standard a player who spends a substantial part of his career in Coors will be held to--Galarraga will be the first test case a few years from now. Mind you, if you spend half your career as Babe Ruth and half as Fred McGriff, obviously you're in.

In The Politics of Glory (1994), James compiled a year-by-year chart of how many future Hall of Famers were then active; from 1946 through 1968, the normal figure was about 30 players in any given year. Using that as a barometer, here are my 30 from this year's pool:

PITCHERS -- Clemens, Maddux, Johnson, P. Martinez, Glavine, Rivera;

POSITION PLAYERS -- Piazza, I. Rodriguez, McGwire, Bagwell, Palmeiro, Thomas, Thome, Helton, Alomar, Biggio, Ripken, Larkin, Jeter, A. Rodriguez, Garciaparra, C. Jones, Henderson, Gwynn, Bonds, Griffey, Sosa, Gonzalez, Ramirez, Guerrero.

HITTER -- E. Martinez.

I cheated--I've got 31. I'm deferring to the widespread assumption that Larkin's as good as in. I've always thought that the large amount of time he's lost to injuries will make his case shakier than suspected, and I might be inclined to reserve that spot for someone out there just starting to make a case for himself: Albert Pujols, Tim Hudson, somebody like that. One of the monthly card magazines recently ran their own projections and had John Franco as a sure thing...huh? 400 saves or not, has Franco ever been included on anyone's shortlist of the game's premier pitchers? If Franco gets in, I'm personally going to lock myself to the front gate at Cooperstown (they don't actually have a front gate, but work with me here) until they also make room for Tom Henke.

Natural Born Plumbers: John Cazale and the Character Actors of the 1970s (2001)

American cinema in the 1970s will always be remembered first and foremost as a legendary decade for directors (the familiar litany of Coppola, Scorsese, Altman, and company) and secondly as a time when a new generation of lead actors superseded the Waynes, Newmans, and McQueens of the '60s (Nicholson, De Niro, and Pacino preeminent among them). It's not a decade famous for its character actors, those familiar-but-elusive faces that turn up in film after film to commandeer the proceedings with some memorable bit of business that stays in your mind long after everything else is forgotten--certainly not in the way that the 1940s, the height of the studio system, is widely regarded as the highwater mark of character acting. In O.K. You Mugs, an anthology of writings on the art of character acting, editors Luc Sante and Melissa Holbrook Pierson define the specialized appeal of the character actor this way: "As they reappear in one film and then another, it is as if they are returning in our very dreams; these characters take on character."

Defined as such, the '70s was actually a time of unforgettable role players. Their names haven't as yet been accorded the same mythological status as Walter Brennan, Ward Bond, Harry Carey, Sidney Greenstreet, or Elisha Cook Jr., but men like Allen Garfield, Ned Beatty, Peter Boyle, Bert Remsen, Harry Dean Stanton, Michael Murphy, Burt Young, Billy Green Bush, and G.D. Spradlin left behind a body of work that was absolutely integral to the key American films of the era. If, like me, much of your movie-going sensibility was shaped by that time and place, De Niro's "You talkin' to me" monologue in Taxi Driver is like scripture; but you probably cherish Peter Boyle's densely layered a-man-is-what-he-does lecture in the same film (culminating in his "It's not Bertrand Russell, but what do you want, I'm a cabbie" apologia, a masterpiece of redundancy) just as much.

And most of all, you cherish John Cazale. Dead at 41 by cancer, Cazale's filmography is endlessly fascinating in its haiku perfection. His career consisted of five films over a seven-year period: the first two Godfathers (1972/4), The Conversation (1974), Dog Day Afternoon (1975), and The Deer Hunter (1978). All five received Academy Award nominations for Best Picture (inexplicably, Cazale himself never earned a supporting nomination); three of them won, The Conversation lost to one of the other five, and only Dog Day Afternoon was beaten by a film that didn't feature Cazale. Leaving aside the validity of the Academy Awards as a barometer of artistic worth (other than to observe that the awards given out during the '70s tended to be more adventurous than at any other time in history), that's a combination of brilliance and brevity unmatched by even James Dean. I've gotten into the habit of referring to Cazale as the Velvet Underground of actors, insofar as everything he ever did has its own secure niche in film history, without a single misstep along the way.

In trying to place Cazale according to Luc Sante's classification of character actors ("Some character actors are foxes and some are hedgehogs: the fox knows many things, while the hedgehog knows one big thing"), I'd say he was a hedgehog with a little bit of fox in him. His specialty, on full display in all his films but one, was everything that fell on the vulnerability end of the emotional spectrum: weakness, ineffectuality, fragility, resignation, invisibility. When Talia Shire pleads with Pacino in Godfather II to forgive Cazale's Fredo, she pins down his overriding persona perfectly: "He's so sweet and helpless." To think of Cazale is to recall first his sad, imploring eyes, the mixture of inadequacy and shame he conveyed--he was one instance where the overused adjective "haunted" is justified. Cazale's performances elicit feelings of protectiveness, a sense of having to look out for a younger sibling. Coppola expertly plays upon this instinct in the Godfathers by turning the Fredo-Michael relationship on its head: it's the older brother who grudgingly submits to being watched over by the younger brother, in time coming to resent the arrangement so deeply that humiliation gives way to betrayal.

In Godfather II's scene inside the Corleone compound where Michael questions and then disowns Fredo, this resentment and humiliation reach their breaking point. Cazale has had relatively little screen time up until then--two significant scenes in The Godfather (most memorably, toadying up to Moe Greene to the withering dismay of Michael) and a lot of jumping through hoops in II (his debauched wife, Johnny Ola)--which makes his confrontation with Michael all the more remarkable. In a brother scene that stands alone with Brando and Steiger in On the Waterfront for its purity and intensity, Cazale seizes his big moment by venturing to a place where almost any actor would look foolish. He completely melts down--when Fredo snaps at Michael that "It's not the way I wanted it," Cazale does a thing with his arms that borders on epileptic seizure. It's a startling transformation.

Cazale's hedgehog-like ability to do one thing exceedingly well--to recede into the background and meekly defer to his superiors--also shapes his portrayals of Stan, Gene Hackman's assistant in The Conversation, and Al Pacino's accomplice Sal in Dog Day Afternoon. Stan is the least neurotic of Cazale's characters, but he's also such a cipher that he's reduced to the role of chattering lapdog to Gene Hackman's Harry Caul, maybe the most socially inept of '70's movie-loners. Harry manifests a painfully evident inferiority complex with just about everyone he encounters, but in his working relationship with Stan, it's Cazale who's shut out and made to feel like an intrusive amateur: "It wouldn't hurt if you filled me in a little bit once in a while, Harry--did you ever think about that?" So he quits to go work for Harry's number-one competitor, the despised William P. Moran (Allen Garfield), as a means of both revenge and retaining some self-respect. It takes all of a few nice words and a vague promise from Harry to bring Stan back into the fold--with a shrug betraying apathy as much as it does loyalty, Cazale reasserts himself as the ultimate pushover.

By the time of Dog Day Afternoon, Cazale's an empty shell. Sidney Lumet's casting deftly echoes the Fredo/Michael relationship by again placing Cazale in a position of feckless subservience to Pacino. Cazale's Sal is afraid of everything: of Pacino's wired unpredictability, of guns, of cancer, of planes, of being reported as a homosexual on local news broadcasts. Cazale comes up with a vibrantly tacky look for Sal--with his long hair, cheap suit, and extra-loud '70s tie, he's like a rough sketch of Benicio Del Toro's character in The Usual Suspects--but the eyes are more lifeless than ever. A lot of Cazale's screen time in Dog Day Afternoon consists of little more than a blank, uncomprehending stare at the unfolding circus around him. Pacino gyrates and schemes and exhorts; Cazale just stands by and waits for the bottom to fall out, which of course it eventually must.

Cazale was enough of a name after Dog Day Afternoon to get second-billing to De Niro in The Deer Hunter. Perhaps feeling boxed in by an emerging pattern of variations on Fredo, Cazale used his newfound visibility for a masterly about-face. This time, all the fumbling silences and little-man significance go to De Niro, Christopher Walken, and John Savage (too much so--at times their lines seem to have been written by Barton Fink), while Cazale reinvents himself as a womanizing, vainglorious blowhard, again named Stan, who stays home and cultivates a moustache while his friends go off to war. Stan is crude, self-aggrandizing, reckless, and 99% bluff--it's like Fredo has been inhabited by Moe Greene. When Cazale starts spewing invective at De Niro's grandiloquent "this-is-this" rationale for not lending him some hunting boots--a scene of comical miscommunication that anticipates Raging Bull's "Did you fuck my wife?" interrogation--he's a profane motormouth far removed from anything Cazale had previously attempted. Stan was a beautifully crafted adumbration of where Cazale might have gone if he hadn't died--proof, really, that he could have gone anywhere.

If Cazale was the most purely gifted of '70s character actors, Allen Garfield may have captured the tenor of the times better than anyone else. There's no more emblematic '70s image to my mind than Garfield stalking around in Nashville, waving off Ned Beatty and Michael Murphy with his mantra of "I got no time, Delbert--I got no time!" In O.K. You Mugs, Greil Marcus envisions the late J.T. Walsh as a reflection of Bill Clinton: a charming lout drifting from one tawdry role to another inside an ambiguous "haze of sincerity." That's the kind of irresistible analogy one can easily overdo, and to prove it, I'm going to overdo a different one: I've always viewed Garfield and many of the '70s' other key character actors as extensions of Richard Nixon, the inescapable white whale of another time.

Cazale was Nixon the brooding, self-pitying outsider--the eternal wallflower who felt inferior to East Coast intellectuals, the part of Nixon that wanted to crawl out of his own skin. You can easily envision Godfather II's compound scene played out between Nixon-as-Fredo and JFK-as-Michael: "I was in the White House before you, Jack, and I was stepped over!" Ned Beatty was Nixon the mechanical bumbler, the one who couldn't work a tape recorder properly; Burt Young and Peter Boyle were Nixon the uncouth slob (all those expletive-deleteds); and G.D. Spradlin (Senator Geary in Godfather II, Nick Nolte's imperious coach in North Dallas Forty) was Nixon the cooly manipulative despot. Garfield had some Nixon in him too, but most of all he was the ultimate Nixon flunky: the compulsive wheeler-dealer, sweating under his collar as he works the crowd, backroom rot with a smile. Garfield's political ad-man in The Candidate (a prototype lifted intact from The Selling of the President 1968, Joe McGinniss's account of how the "New Nixon" came to be) and his squalid wiretapper in The Conversation were two of the most gleefully amoral small-time operators of the era, natural born plumbers on the order of Hunt and Liddy. (Even as Ronee Blakely's avowedly apolitical husband/manager in Nashville, Garfield still managed to come across as a weasel-for-hire.) When Garfield offered his assessment of some welfare mothers gumming up one of his ads in The Candidate, his words were as sure a marker as "Ohio," Joe (Peter Boyle as the phantasmagoric embodiment of Nixon and Agnew's "silent majority"), or All in the Family that the Nixon decade was well underway: "Grim scene, baby, grim scene...You look uptight and uncool. Nobody's listening and nobody's digging you." To which Garfield, Robert Redford, and everyone within earshot burst out laughing.

The peculiarly feral quality of Garfield can be found in Steve Buscemi's best work during the '90s, just as Cazale and his contemporaries have their own modern-day equivalents in Philip Seymour Hoffman, Michael Imperioli, and Luis Guzman. In time, stray moments from this current generation of character specialists will seem much more vital than most of the huffing and puffing that now pushes them into the background (or a lot sooner than then--a few seconds of Guzman and Don Cheadle clowning around in Traffic is worth the whole Michael Douglas subplot). John Cazale packed more of those moments into five films than anyone I can think of. In Coppola's hollow Godfather III, Fredo is only present as an absence, as empty space on a rowboat; Michael is consumed by the memory of standing at the window, looking out on the one murder that in time will come to weigh heaviest of all on his conscience. That flashback to the empty rowboat is The Godfather III's most resonant image--tribute to the enduring power of the first two Godfathers, but perhaps even more so to the deep impression left behind by Cazale.


(Originally published in Cinemascope)

The Day That She Met Me (2001)

2000 Year-End Ballot

1. "Sour Girl," Stone Temple Pilots: After a false start, Stone Temple Pilots' junky Nirvana imitation has become much livelier and more unpredictable than Pearl Jam's ever-more lugubrious one. (The radio agrees: Toronto stations continue to play "Even Flow" and "Alive," the two Pearl Jam songs with some forward momentum, to death, more or less ignoring everything else.) Actually, on "Vaseline" and "Interstate Love Song" and "Trippin' on a Hole," there wasn't much of an attempt at all to mimic Nirvana--"Interstate Love Song" is a title that belongs on a Marshall Tucker Band album, and the song itself has some of that group's same feel for wide-open spaces. Having said all that, even those songs seem clumsy next to "Sour Girl," whose free-floating weightlessness is touched by pop genius. As with Alice Deejay below, the lyrics function mostly as mantra: the subtle inversion around the title--sour the day she meets him, happy the day she leaves--and the stalker-like suggestiveness of "What would you do if I followed you?" And in the middle break, a line that should have provoked more offense than any of the Eminem singles: "The girl got reasons/They all got reasons." In a very casual, offhanded way, that's a lot of ill-will squeezed into eight words: hostile, patronizing, infantile, dismissive, kind of hateful even. It's the purest, most unguarded bit of male smugness I've come across since my favorite moment of the Simpson trial, the one time when I felt like cheering Johnnie Cochran: (looking askance at Judge Ito after waiting out one of Marcia Clark's worst-abuse-of-the-criminal-justice-system-ever harangues) "Is she finished yet?"

2. "Brand New Low," Treble Charger: Buzz and howl under the influence of 1985. The shift into "And I wanna know..." each time the chorus comes around is my favorite leap up the vocal scale since the chorus of Green Day's "Walking Contradiction."

3. "My Music at Work," Tragically Hip: Two in a row from home--hey, you're acting like you've never seen a Canadian before. I heard a DJ correctly point out how it could be Ethel Merman singing here; the name Foghorn Leghorn comes to mind too. But I think this is the Tragically Hip's second great single in two years. I'm just as surprised this time as I was with "Fireworks," so I guess I still expect the worst from them.

4. "All the Small Things" and 5. "Adam's Song," Blink 182: None of the boy- or girl-bands appeal to the nine-year-old in me, but Blink 182 stirs the 13-year-old in there. I remember hearing "Hey Jude" on the radio one night in grade 9, when I was wracking my mind over whether or not to ask Nancy Phillips to a dance, and convincing myself that the song was addressed to me personally, urging me to go forward. (What a middlebrow Beatles song to be receiving secret messages from. I never would have lasted in the Manson Family.) The first time I really noticed "Adam's Song" was when Adam Pugsley played it last spring at my grade 6 class's year-end party. Me: "What's that?" Adam: "'Adam's Song.'" Must be wonderful to be that age, the exact moment when adolescent boys start to move from Top 40 to what my own little group refers to as "older-brother music," and have a strange new punk song belong to you without even having to embellish. I felt like an intruder just asking.

6. "Bring It All to Me," Blaque: Warm and fuzzy girl group R&B, Jean Arthur in soft-focus to Destiny Child's (or forebears En Vogue's) Barbara Stanwyck. Instead of a forefinger admonishing some guy over all the things he's not, Blaque invites him to bring along "your special brand of 'G'" and settle back. (Seventeen different websites have the lyric as "your time, your love, your space, your energy," but obviously they're all wrong.) Somewhere along the way, "G" passed from the concrete noun that Dr. Dre and Warren G celebrated into the realm of abstraction--it's now an essence, like courage or thrift or humility. Self-help books are on the way: "G" for the Soul. Pathway to "G." How to Control Your "G" Before It Controls You.

7. "Better Off Alone," Alice Deejay: Very elliptical: a single question, "Do you think you're better off alone?", played off over and over again against a trailing afterthought, "Talk to me." It's not clear whether the singer is a girlfriend, an ex-girlfriend, a friend-friend, or a bad conscience. In any case, it's a good question.

8. "Porcelain," Moby: The beauty in "Porcelain" does not sound effortless the way it does in "Eight Days a Week," "Till the Morning Comes," or anything else I'd place in the very first-rank of pop-song bliss. It's a very clinical, academic kind of beauty, the kind you get in Terence Malick films. But it's something to lose yourself in anyway.

9. "I Wanna Know," Joe: There's an instrumental curlicue throughout "I Wanna Know" that sets it apart from any other soul ballad I heard this year, a little three- or four-note flourish that punctuates the verse lines, and that's what gets it on the list. Whether I'll remember the curlicue or anything else about the song five years from now, I don't know. As Winston Churchill famously said, the soul ballad in the era of Mary J. Blige is a wisp wrapped inside of a fragment wrapped inside of a mirage. There are a number of them from the past decade that I either listed on my year-end ballot or reviewed favorably at the time--"Twisted," "Lady," "G.H.E.T.T.O.U.T.," "Touch Me, Tease Me," "Candy Rain," "He's Mine"--that I draw a complete blank on right now. That's not a knock, just an observation. "I Wanna Know" was Billboard's fourth-biggest single of the year.

10. "Independent Women Part 1," Destiny's Child: Independent young women--the minute they wake up, only 263 people start to go to work on them. The smile that I wear, I bought it; the way I move my arm, I bought it. I'm being unfair--Bob Dylan told some tall tales too. The strings have some dramatic swoop to them, some twilight cityscape, and the histrionics that strangle this group's other singles are kept to a minimum, sort of. Rough translation: I pine for Lucy Liu.


Cold Late Nights, So Long Ago: I love "Sour Girl," but this is the third year running that a film has been a much richer pop-music experience for me than any one piece of music. You could, I suppose, find the same fault with The Virgin Suicides that I do with "Porcelain" above, and absent Heart, Todd Rundgren, Carole King, and Air, Sofia Coppola's movie probably would collapse into a somnambulant pretty picture--I'm no fan of Picnic at Hanging Rock. But with the songs in place, the dreaminess of the pacing, the narration, and the cinematography coalesces into something very felt: the music gets at something deeper than the words and the images can on their own, and Coppola has the good sense (or the good counsel, if you believe speculation--I don't) to let the soundtrack take over at those moments. It's disappointing to see The Virgin Suicides get only scant attention in year-end polls (a few stray votes here and there, even fewer than what Boogie Nights or Rushmore got), especially when it gets passed over in favor of what is also essentially a mood piece, the Ang Lee film, but a sillier one. Film critics are impressed by subtitles. If Adam Sandler movies had subtitles, they'd be programming them at art galleries.

Tuesday, March 3, 2026

And He Walked on Down the Hall (2001)

The voting for this summer's Hall of Fame inductees will be released next week. Sports Illustrated's Tom Verducci has a good overview and analysis of this year's field available on the CNN/SI site, along with his own picks. Most of the attention right now is focussed on Winfield, Puckett, and Mattingly, with the latter two a potential source of contention. (The only conceivable red flag I can see against Winfield is that he padded his career totals towards the end as a full-time DH. He was sucha good athlete, though, it's a specious argument. I don't have any doubt that Winfield could have, had it been necessary--as it was in the '92 Series for the games played in Atlanta—still done a better-than-adequate job in the field. He wasn't exactly in the tradition of Cecil Fielder/Dave Kingman DHs.) There's a nice symmetry between the three of them as to how players get into the Hall of Fame: Winfield represents the long-and-distinguished career route, Mattingly the meteoric Koufax-like peak period, and Puckett, because of his premature retirement, an odd combination of the two.

Like Verducci, I'd cast votes for Winfield and Puckett but pass on Mattingly. (Verducci is also voting for Rice and Gary Carter; I'd probably limit my ballot to no more than three names, and I think I'd look to a pitcher for the third choice, either Blyleven or Morris. Between Ryan's induction two years ago and the eventual first-ballot pick of Clemens and Maddux, we're in the midst of a fallow time for starting pitchers. Eckersley and Lee Smith might be it for pitchers of any kind until 2010 or thereabouts.)

It's interesting how closely Winfield, Puckett, and Mattingly line up using Bill James's HOF point system. As James was always quick to clarify, the system was devised to predict who will get into the Hall, not who should--it's based on players who are already in there, an attempt to extrapolate from their career resumes what the writers give weight to when casting their votes. A full rundown of what conclusions James arrived at--e.g., hitting .353 in a season is worth five points, while an MVP award gets you eight--is available in The Politics of Glory, his meticulous look at the Hall and the history of its voting patterns.

By my count, Puckett totals 159.5 points according to James, Winfield is at 148, and Mattingly trails with 132. That's a fairly close spread; people like Mays and Ryan score well up into the 200s, while your Ray Oylers, Fred Talbots, or just about anyone else on the '69 Pilots doesn't make it into double-digits. All three clear 130 points, which is James's bar for a lock; 100-130 points means a high probability of induction, 70-100 points is what he calls the gray area (where a lot of Veteran's Committee picks reside), and under-70 translates as no chance. It may be surprising that Mattingly would rate as a sure thing, and even more surprising that Puckett would out-point Winfield and his 3,000 hits.

Because Puckett didn't last long enough to compile the instantly identifiable benchmarks he was headed towards--3,000 hits with room to spare, probably 300+ home runs, 1,500 runs and RBIs--and because he was never quite the colossus during his prime that Koufax was (a shortcoming he shares with 99.9% of everyone who ever played the game), I'm guessing that Kirby is not being thought of as an automatic first-ballot pick by the majority of baseball fans. It's difficult to appreciate how much he packed into his abbreviated career unless you take a good look as his batting line, which looks like something out of the '30s, the kind of dense statistical barrage that Paul Waner or Joe Medwick put together--big, fat numbers the whole way, with hits, doubles, and total bases accumulating rapidly. Medwick especially makes for a good comp, the biggest difference being that while Kirby's career was bookended by the offensive surge of '85-87 and the early years of the current boom, almost half of it fell during the offensive downturn of '88-92, the last time in memory that pitchers maintained a relative upper-hand in baseball. If you were to transport Puckett to the '30s, I'm sure he would have produced years interchangeable with what Medwick accomplished from '33 to '39. They're close enough as is: a .318 career BA, .477 OBA, and .360 SA for Puckett, .324/.505/.360 for Medwick.

Comparing Kirby to Mattingly, they both experienced easily isolated (and overlapping) three-year peaks early in their careers: Puckett's ran from '86 to '88, during which time he rang up 664 hits and over 40% of his career home runs, while Mattingly was consensus pick as the game's best player from '84 to '86, when he finished 5-1-2 in MVP voting. A comparison of their peak years underscores why Puckett deserves enshrinement first.

Not surprisingly, Mattingly comes out ahead in virtually every key category for those three-year windows--but the gap is not nearly as pronounced as you might guess:

 

AB

HR

TB

R

RBI

BB

BA

SA

OBP

RC/27

K.P.

1961

83

1056

324

316

89

.339

.539

.369

7.91

D.M.

1932

89

1082

315

368

150

.340

.560

.387

8.37

Pretty close, right? RBI and walks are the only areas where Mattingly holds a significant edge. If you want to make the Koufax argument for Mattingly, then Puckett makes a good stand-in for Marichal, closely shadowing him every step of the way.

Placed in the context of their entire careers, however, Mattingly's '84-86 block represents 82 of his 132 points under James, or 62%; Puckett's '86-88 accounts for only 60 of his 159.5, or 38% (leaving aside any consideration of how much their .300+ career averages, worth 8 points to each under the system, are attributable to these peak periods). So although Mattingly's heyday is not demonstrably superior to Puckett's, it does indeed bear a much greater burden of his Hall of Fame candidacy. Take away those three years, and the balance of their careers weighs heavily in Puckett's favour.

As do some key intangibles. The Yankees were generally in contention through most of Mattingly's career, but they didn't win much of anything—a strike-shortened divisional title and wild-card berth during his final two years, when he was no longer a force. Kirby, meanwhile, was the resident superstar on two of the weaker World Series winners of the past quarter-century (and was named MVP of the '91 Series). Both were perennial Gold Glove winners, but Puckett played a far more demanding position. Puckett, though he never stole more than 21 bases in a season, had a clear edge in speed (Mattingly never stole more than three--if memory serves, he was regarded as one of the slowest non-catchers in the game). Both had their careers shortened by health problems, with Mattingly struggling through prolonged back trouble and Kirby suddenly coming down with glaucoma during spring training in 1996. Because Mattingly spent a good part of his career trying to play through his ailments, I'd say he was the more adversely affected of the two.

Most of all, though, Kirby was Kirby. I don't think I'd use the word "adorable" to describe any other professional athlete, but adorable he was. Before there were Teletubbies, Furbys, or Pikachus, there was Kirby. James once wrote that if Puckett and Tony Gwynn were to have a footrace, it'd look like two bowling balls rolling side-by-side down the lane. Kirby's teammates used to rub his head for luck. In another lifetime, he would have been a little bobbing-head on somebody's dashboard. He made a truckload of money (the first to break the $3-million barrier), but he did so in a way that never antagonized anybody; when management was slow to re-sign him one year, Twins fans made it very clear they were ready to boycott. I wonder if Kirby was ever booed in a major league park anywhere? Of course he was--but really, what kind of a heartless monster would you have to be to boo Kirby?

I just hope that when he gets voted into Cooperstown next week, there's no lingering suspicion that he's primarily a sentimental pick. Go back and look at the record. If Mattingly goes in too, that's OK--I wouldn't vote for him myself, not yet anyway, but along with Brett, he was probably the scariest hitter I've ever seen for those three years that he seemed destined for DiMaggio/Mantle-like status. If there are any voters who deem Mattingly as more qualified than Puckett, though--and I bet there are at least a few, both in and out of New York--that's insupportable.

--------------------

POSTSCRIPT: I said above that I might vote for Jack Morris, but truthfully, I'm not sure--that may be based more than anything else on the feeling that there needs to be at least one starting pitcher in Cooperstown who accumulated the bulk of his credentials in the 1980s (something no longer true of Clemens). Morris scores 123.5 points under James, suggesting he'll probably be inducted in time, by the Veteran's Committee if not the writers. A roughly weighted rundown of the pros and cons:

PUT HIM IN: 1) The tagline that's become synonomous with Morris: "Winningest pitcher of the '80s" (a relatively modest 162);

2) Game 7 of the '91 Series, a 10-inning, complete-game 1-0 victory—on the shortlist of greatest Series starts ever, arguably second only to Larsen;

3) 250+ career wins, a very solid total for the post Seaver/Carlton generation of starters. Clemens just passed him and Maddux will soon, but 250 wins is becoming a thing of the past;

4) Three 20-win seasons, ace of two Series winners, good lifetime winning percentage (.577).

NO WAY: 1) E.R.A.: 3.90 lifetime, with not a single season under 3.00;

2) Besides never winning a Cy Young, at no time during the '80s was Morris considered the best pitcher in baseball. Well, maybe for the first two months of '84, when the Tigers were invincible and he was 10-1 through May. Otherwise, it was Carlton from '80 through '82; at some point between '83 and '85 the title passed from Dave Stieb to Dwight Gooden; and Clemens was the guy the rest of the way. Morris won more games than any of them, but that was a function of the calendar, not ability;

3) Mediocre SO/BB ratio. I don't know if that'll matter, but it should--Morris was under 2.00, which to me should be the floor for any post-expansion Hall of Fame pitcher;

4) He was thought of as a self-centered jerk for much of his career. If you're Steve Carlton or Barry Bonds, that kind of thing doesn't matter. (Bonds's recent conversion to good-guy approachability is amusing. He should go back to being a full-time prima donna--you're in, Barry, you can do whatever you want.) If you're borderline, it might.

So I don't know. Bert Blyleven's numbers are better, but intuitively he makes even less sense than Morris. In a perfect world, I'd give the nod to Tom Henke over either of them, but in that direction lies sabermetric madness.

Strange Magic: The Pop-Music Soundtrack from American Graffiti to Sofia Coppola (2001)

On the second-last day of school this year, I showed my grade six class American Graffiti. Pop music and film already exert some influence on most of my 29 kids, though clearly not as much as television, the Internet, or Digimons. My hope was that this would be the first time they'd experience pop music used expressively in a film (as opposed to merely decoratively or cross-promotionally, i.e., the Nine Inch Nails/Red Hot Chili Peppers/Busta Rhymes kind of soundtrack with which they're familiar), and that a few might be as permanently affected as I was at their age when I sat through American Graffiti twice one summer afternoon in 1974. If such an awakening did take place, those affected were pretty quiet about it; some fidgeted, most looked bored, and the only time they got into the spirit of things was when Paul LeMat barreled into the parking lot to save Charles Martin Smith from a beating. For those 30 seconds, my guess was that they were responding to what seemed a little like a Jackie Chan film.

American Graffiti appeared more or less simultaneously with Mean Streets in 1973, and even though the style and sensibility of their directors are worlds removed from each other, the two films are closer than you might think in the way their characters relate to pop music. The music in American Graffiti and Mean Streets primarily belongs to George Lucas and Martin Scorsese; characters make occasional reference to what they're hearing--David Proval's insistence on "only oldies tonight" in Mean Streets, LeMat's dismissive preference for Buddy Holly over the Beach Boys in American Graffiti--but for all intents and purposes, the soundtracks express the tastes, personalities, and autobiographies of Lucas and Scorsese much more than that of their characters.

In Mean Streets, this seems especially obvious. When De Niro makes his flashy entrance into a bar accompanied by "Jumpin' Jack Flash," the effect is virtuosic, but it's highly likely that Johnny Boy has only the dimmest awareness of who the Rolling Stones are. Even Charlie (Harvey Keitel), through whose ambivalent eyes we're seeing Johnny Boy, is more a product of the soundtrack's Italian standards than he is of Beggars Banquet. And the one time that Johnny Boy responds directly to what we're hearing--when he does his little spastic dance outside the getaway car to the Miracles' "Mickey's Monkey"--you're again aware that he's not someone who'd ever actually own a Smokey Robinson record, much less think, talk, or develop any kind of an opinion whatsoever about Smokey Robinson. The Miracles, the Rolling Stones, and to a lesser degree the doo-wop and girl-group music that takes up the bulk of Mean Streets' soundtrack, are there because Scorsese wants them to be there. The decision of whether to use "Jumpin' Jack Flash" or "Street Fighting Man," for instance, is one of infinite meaning and nuance for Scorsese, the difference between the "everyday inferno" (Pauline Kael's words) he's after, and the easy period-identification that would be enough for a lesser director. For his characters, though, such distinctions are nonexistent: it's all just amorphous background din.

American Graffiti, where the music would seem to be of paramount importance to Lucas' cross-section of seven California teenagers, is somewhat trickier. Every kid listens to Wolfman Jack's radio show incessantly, they go to their school homecoming and dance to "At the Hop" and "The Stroll," and their dress, mannerisms, and talk reflect the teenage worlds vividly mapped out in songs by Chuck Berry, Eddie Cochran, and Dion DiMucci. For all of that, however, pop music often doesn't have any more of an emotional pull on Lucas' nascent surfers and hippies than it does on Scorsese's low-rent hoods--less, actually. Do Richard Dreyfuss' Curt and Ronnie Howard's Steve seem like pop obsessives, the kind of characters who'd mark the events of their lives by specific songs heard in specific situations, who'd look to pop music for a deeper understanding of themselves, who'd maybe even romantically (and foolishly) weigh a life decision against a line from a favourite song? To me, no, they're too level-headed, and so is Cindy Williams' Laurie. (LeMat, Smith, and Candy Clark, maybe; Mackenzie Phillips, definitely.) The music drives the narrative forward--the Monotones' "Book of Love" when Phillips flees LeMat's car, Booker T.'s "Green Onions" as an omen of disaster--and it routinely mirrors what characters are feeling, but again, it's first and foremost a directorial device. You're hearing what's inside George Lucas' head, not what's in Curt's or Steve's.

I've singled out American Graffiti and Mean Streets because together they set a framework within which most of the worthwhile pop-driven films of the past 25 years can be located: a director visualizes a particular scene or sequence through the filter of some favourite piece of music, and the music in turn is used to shape and choreograph the scene in a way that is meant to resonate deeply. Generally, the song has only the most incidental, historical, or casual connections to the characters on hand, and sometimes not even that. This holds true for Creedence Clearwater Revival's "Fortunate Son" in Jonathan Demme's Melvin and Howard (Paul LeMat's Melvin Dumar is the very definition of who John Fogerty was trying to find a voice for, but, for that very reason, Dumar himself wouldn't know the first thing about CCR); the Byrds and the Turtles in Jonathan Kaplan's excellent Heart Like a Wheel (housewife-with-kids Shirley Muldowney's sole connection to music is the country & western her dad used to sing for her; the Byrds and the Turtles come out of Kaplan's life); and GoodFellas (the slow-motion shot of De Niro underneath Cream's "Sunshine of Your Love" gets to the core of Jimmy Conway's spiritual rot like nothing else in the film, even though Jimmy himself couldn't possibly be any more removed from the world inhabited by Cream). The same dynamic is evident in the more recent mastery of Boogie Nights (where Paul Thomas Anderson's porn-happy ensemble essentially has the same relationship to disco that American Graffiti's teenagers have to rock 'n' roll: music's a plaything, an ever-present ambience that fills the space around them and gives them something to dance to, but it's far from the central fact of anybody's life) and Rushmore (Jason Schwartzman's Max Fischer is like one of Pete Townshend's misfit heroes come to life, but Max's own tastes are better represented by the cheesy seduction tape he plays for Ms. Cross than the Who, Kinks, and Creation songs Wes Anderson chose for Rushmore).

In each case, there's a disconnect between the film's characters and its soundtrack, a pattern that reaches its logical conclusion, at once comical and hypnotic, in Lars von Trier's Breaking the Waves. Here, the narrative is literally stopped at various points for a series of static landscape shots underneath a progression of 1970s art-glam songs (David Bowie, Jethro Tull, Roxy Music). I suppose someone could develop a reasonable case for how these songs are intricately linked to the psyches of von Trier's characters, but to me their inclusion is much more easily explained: they're the director's favourite songs, and he was going to get them into his film no matter what. If von Trier had instead been directing The First Wives Club, I'm almost willing to bet that the same soundtrack would have been part of the package.

There are exceptions in these films and others--stray moments when a character reveals a deeper attachment to whatever music's playing in the background, when ownership of the soundtrack passes from director to character. Towards the end of Boogie Nights, in the celebrated firecracker/"Sister Christian" sequence, there's a close-up of Mark Wahlberg's Dirk Diggler as his attention shifts from the surrounding mayhem to the lyrics of Rick Springfield's "Jessie's Girl" from one of Rahad Jackson's "awesome mix tapes." Dirk loses himself in the song, gets caught up in the way Springfield tells the story of Dirk's own feelings for Julianne Moore's Amber Waves, and the trace of a smile starts to cross his face. It's a profound pop-music moment, the best cinematic translation I've ever encountered of an old Steely Dan lyric: "All night long, we sang that stupid song/And every word we sang I knew was true." Anderson went on to give his characters an even greater emotional stake in Magnolia's soundtrack during the great "Wise Up" montage.

Three recent films have appeared that may or may not signal a new kind of pop-music movie, one in which the soundtrack is less in service of a director's personality and is more intimately connected with the thoughts, actions, and aspirations of the film's characters--in short, where characters either talk directly about the music we hear, ruminating on its place in their lives or using it as a sounding board for their theories about the world, or, in one extraordinary instance, consciously choosing soundtrack music that is going to speak for them. The Virgin Suicides, High Fidelity, and American Psycho are very different films in terms of tone and genre, yet their soundtracks all feel like clear departures from the Scorsese/Lucas-influenced style of the past quarter-century.

Mary Harron's American Psycho is the weakest of the three, a heavy-handed art-splatter film whose one idea, that the materialistic excesses of the Reagan era produced monsters in our midst (with Reagan himself, predictably enough, dangled out there as the biggest monster of them all), was handled with more wit and economy in TV's Family Ties. That aside, Harron sticks close to the digressions and detours of Bret Easton Ellis's novel, preserving for us the bizarre juxtaposition of Christian Bale's Patrick Bateman expounding earnestly on the significance of Huey Lewis, Robert Palmer, and Phil Collins just before putting his victims out of their misery in more ways than one. Speaking as someone who worked at a record store during the summer of 1986, Ellis's intuitive grasp of the music which came to define that precise moment in pop history is flawless. Lewis, Palmer, and Collins, along with maybe Lionel Richie and Billy Ocean, are locked into place as surely as Bateman himself--weird, immaculate, anonymous spaces that still linger. Mary Harron's musical voice can be found in I Shot Andy Warhol and old issues of Punk magazine; American Psycho's soundtrack is meticulously and presciently programmed by Bateman, as precise a pop critic as he is serial killer.

Bateman's Top-40 monologues are an opportune time to bring up Quentin Tarantino, whose most famous musical set piece, the Stealer's Wheel scene from Reservoir Dogs, would fit comfortably into American Psycho. Tarantino is something of a bridge between the Scorsese/Lucas tradition and the recent blip of character-driven soundtracks. Unlike Scorsese's hoods, Tarantino's characters reveal an intellectual, if not always emotional, attachment to pop music: observe the Madonna roundtable and Chris Penn's close analysis of "The Night the Lights Went Out in Georgia" in Reservoir Dogs, or Sam Jackson trading thoughts on the Delfonics with Robert Forster in Jackie Brown. In the first two cases, it's hard to hear the talk that accompanies the music as coming from anyone other than Tarantino himself. When Mr. Brown and Mr. Blue start dissecting "Like a Virgin," it's like a great in-joke on the gulf between Jimmy Conway and Cream in GoodFellas--the words are Tarantino's, not Mr. Brown's, and they carry about as much spiritual weight as Homer Simpson wistfully pining for the bygone days of Supertramp. But in Jackie Brown, you really do hear the Delfonics through the ears of Forster and Pam Grier, signalling a move from Tarantino to his characters as the controlling sensibility.

There's probably more talk about pop music in High Fidelity than in any narrative film ever made, much of it lifted verbatim from Nick Hornby's novel. Too much talk, sometimes--after a thrillingly resonant opening, "You're Gonna Miss Me" blaring over a close-up of a spinning 45, the music drops out and John Cusack needlessly starts explaining what the Thirteenth Floor Elevators' monument to spite and self-pity has already made perfectly clear. Far from channeling its characters and its music onto two separate tracks--with the narrative looking after the former and the director in charge of the latter--High Fidelity immerses Cusack and his record-store buddies in the daily rituals, idiosyncrasies, and private enthusiasms that grow out of a full-fledged pop obsession. Sometimes the surfeit of detail works fine: You could see High Fidelity six times and still have fun scanning the frame for familiar album covers, and the one time when the record store's busy and we hop from fragment to fragment of overheard conversation--Stiff Little Fingers, Blonde on Blonde, Psychocandy, the Beta Band--director Stephen Frears lowers the volume on Cusack a bit and lets the film find its own rhythm. In the end, however, the movie has all the surface noise of Hornby's novel without the underlying melancholy.

Sofia Coppola's The Virgin Suicides is pitched far away from High Fidelity's esoteric clutter, but its austerity and restraint are deceptive: no matter how encyclopedic Cusack's pop-music I.Q. is in High Fidelity, or how much his record collection dwarfs the solitary milk crate owned by Kirsten Dunst's Lux in The Virgin Suicides, it's Coppola's film that comes closer to capturing from the inside the experience of what it's like to give part of your life over to pop music--closer, maybe, than any film ever has. In Dazed and Confused, an earlier version of growing up in the '70s, Richard Linklater's teenagers seemed barely cognizant of the Foghat and Edgar Winter that played non-stop on the radio as they drove around town. Linklater had the songs down cold, but I only rarely sensed that any of them meant anything to the kids--whatever feeling of kinship I took away were for Linklater, who clearly shares some biography with me, not for his characters. The Virgin Suicides uses about one-seventh the amount of music heard in Dazed and Confused, but every second registers. Sometimes, like with the incredible introduction of Trip Fontane to Heart's "Magic Man," Coppola sticks close to Scorsese: pick the right song, play it loud and let it play, and let the music do the rest. Even there, though, "Magic Man" pointedly speaks for all the girls hanging off their lockers and swooning as Trip walks down the hall, so when "Crazy on You" accompanies Lux's and Trip's seismic first kiss soon after, it's as if Heart has been officially designated as a talisman to the kids, something that closes off their world to outsiders. From there it's a short step to the homecoming dance, where Electric Light Orchestra's "Strange Magic," 10cc's "I'm Not in Love," and Styx's "Come Sail Away" speak a secret language of longing and desire understood immediately by anyone who went to high school at the time. Which would not, significantly, include Sofia Coppola--I haven't read the source novel for The Virgin Suicides, from which I take it some of the songs are lifted intact, but in any case the music is wholly an extension of the characters, not Coppola (who was five years old at the time).

All of this serves as prelude to the fallout from the dance. First, Mrs. Lisbon's record-burning edict, the first time in the movie one of the daughters is forced to articulate the role that pop music plays in her life. It's important that Mrs. Lisbon's ultimate punishment should target Lux's record collection: as Lux clings to her milk crate to the point of being dragged down the stairs behind it, the same music that has already been established as a binding force among the film's teenagers is now moved into the realm of the purely personal, the realm of the pop obsessive. The sight of a record (any record) going up in flames might not resonate like the sled in Citizen Kane, but to anybody who collects vinyl it's a disturbing image nonetheless. (For a whole gallery of traumatized record collectors, see Alan Zweig's recent documentary Vinyl.)

Finally, there's what I've come to think of as the playing-records-over-the-phone sequence. I'd place it alongside the Copa entrance in GoodFellas (to the Crystals' "Then He Kissed Me"), the pool party in Boogie Nights (Eric Burdon's "Spill the Wine"), and Max's extracurricular resume in Rushmore (the Creation's "Making Time") as the scene against which all pop cinema should be measured. For no apparent reason other than the simple truth that there's nothing one can say that hasn't been said with perfect eloquence somewhere in a pop song, the Lisbon girls and their worshipful chorus of boy admirers renew contact by playing records to each other over the phone. The songs are carefully chosen and a story emerges. The boys lead with Todd Rundgren's "Hello It's Me," a smile and a new beginning; the girls respond with Gilbert O'Sullivan's "Alone Again, Naturally," which talks of suicide. The boys come back with the Bee Gees' "Run to Me," an intimation of safety and acceptance; the girls promptly cut them off with Carole King's "So Far Away," leaving only distance and resignation. I might have extended the scene to find room for Badfinger's "Day After Day" and Harry Nilsson's "Without You," but otherwise, perfection. Coppola takes one of the most basic instincts of pop fandom, the desire to share your obsessions with the world--"Hey, you've got to hear this"--and retells the film in miniature.

Coppola, who like most directors her age has been influenced to one degree or another by music videos, suggests a new kind of synthesis for pop cinema: a combination of Scorsese's dazzle, Lucas' command of period, a complex and carefully developed affinity between character and soundtrack, and something more elusive--an intuitive feel for the kind of atmospherics needed to sustain the best music videos across minutes of wordless narrative. Music and image are melded in The Virgin Suicides in a manner that gives resonance not just to the dynamic high points (where Scorsese and Lucas operate), but also to the quieter, Air-scored passages that give the movie an enigmatic dreaminess befitting the five Lisbon sisters. The scene where the boys read from Cecilia's diary, triggering a fantasy of Lux frolicking in sun-drenched fields underneath Air's "Ce matin la," is video-influenced in the best sense, the sensual elevation of mood and gesture above all else. Coppola's husband, Spike Jonze, is probably the most celebrated video director of the past decade, and her brother Roman directed Green Day's "Walking Contradiction," on the short-list of my favourite videos ever. Clearly Coppola has benefited from some helpful familial ties in terms of drawing on the conventions of video, and she uses them exceedingly well. In doing so, she opens up new possibilities for the pop-music soundtrack.


(Originally published in Cinemascope.)