Tuesday, March 3, 2026

Strange Magic: The Pop-Music Soundtrack from American Graffiti to Sofia Coppola (2001)

On the second-last day of school this year, I showed my grade six class American Graffiti. Pop music and film already exert some influence on most of my 29 kids, though clearly not as much as television, the Internet, or Digimons. My hope was that this would be the first time they'd experience pop music used expressively in a film (as opposed to merely decoratively or cross-promotionally, i.e., the Nine Inch Nails/Red Hot Chili Peppers/Busta Rhymes kind of soundtrack with which they're familiar), and that a few might be as permanently affected as I was at their age when I sat through American Graffiti twice one summer afternoon in 1974. If such an awakening did take place, those affected were pretty quiet about it; some fidgeted, most looked bored, and the only time they got into the spirit of things was when Paul LeMat barreled into the parking lot to save Charles Martin Smith from a beating. For those 30 seconds, my guess was that they were responding to what seemed a little like a Jackie Chan film.

American Graffiti appeared more or less simultaneously with Mean Streets in 1973, and even though the style and sensibility of their directors are worlds removed from each other, the two films are closer than you might think in the way their characters relate to pop music. The music in American Graffiti and Mean Streets primarily belongs to George Lucas and Martin Scorsese; characters make occasional reference to what they're hearing--David Proval's insistence on "only oldies tonight" in Mean Streets, LeMat's dismissive preference for Buddy Holly over the Beach Boys in American Graffiti--but for all intents and purposes, the soundtracks express the tastes, personalities, and autobiographies of Lucas and Scorsese much more than that of their characters.

In Mean Streets, this seems especially obvious. When De Niro makes his flashy entrance into a bar accompanied by "Jumpin' Jack Flash," the effect is virtuosic, but it's highly likely that Johnny Boy has only the dimmest awareness of who the Rolling Stones are. Even Charlie (Harvey Keitel), through whose ambivalent eyes we're seeing Johnny Boy, is more a product of the soundtrack's Italian standards than he is of Beggars Banquet. And the one time that Johnny Boy responds directly to what we're hearing--when he does his little spastic dance outside the getaway car to the Miracles' "Mickey's Monkey"--you're again aware that he's not someone who'd ever actually own a Smokey Robinson record, much less think, talk, or develop any kind of an opinion whatsoever about Smokey Robinson. The Miracles, the Rolling Stones, and to a lesser degree the doo-wop and girl-group music that takes up the bulk of Mean Streets' soundtrack, are there because Scorsese wants them to be there. The decision of whether to use "Jumpin' Jack Flash" or "Street Fighting Man," for instance, is one of infinite meaning and nuance for Scorsese, the difference between the "everyday inferno" (Pauline Kael's words) he's after, and the easy period-identification that would be enough for a lesser director. For his characters, though, such distinctions are nonexistent: it's all just amorphous background din.

American Graffiti, where the music would seem to be of paramount importance to Lucas' cross-section of seven California teenagers, is somewhat trickier. Every kid listens to Wolfman Jack's radio show incessantly, they go to their school homecoming and dance to "At the Hop" and "The Stroll," and their dress, mannerisms, and talk reflect the teenage worlds vividly mapped out in songs by Chuck Berry, Eddie Cochran, and Dion DiMucci. For all of that, however, pop music often doesn't have any more of an emotional pull on Lucas' nascent surfers and hippies than it does on Scorsese's low-rent hoods--less, actually. Do Richard Dreyfuss' Curt and Ronnie Howard's Steve seem like pop obsessives, the kind of characters who'd mark the events of their lives by specific songs heard in specific situations, who'd look to pop music for a deeper understanding of themselves, who'd maybe even romantically (and foolishly) weigh a life decision against a line from a favourite song? To me, no, they're too level-headed, and so is Cindy Williams' Laurie. (LeMat, Smith, and Candy Clark, maybe; Mackenzie Phillips, definitely.) The music drives the narrative forward--the Monotones' "Book of Love" when Phillips flees LeMat's car, Booker T.'s "Green Onions" as an omen of disaster--and it routinely mirrors what characters are feeling, but again, it's first and foremost a directorial device. You're hearing what's inside George Lucas' head, not what's in Curt's or Steve's.

I've singled out American Graffiti and Mean Streets because together they set a framework within which most of the worthwhile pop-driven films of the past 25 years can be located: a director visualizes a particular scene or sequence through the filter of some favourite piece of music, and the music in turn is used to shape and choreograph the scene in a way that is meant to resonate deeply. Generally, the song has only the most incidental, historical, or casual connections to the characters on hand, and sometimes not even that. This holds true for Creedence Clearwater Revival's "Fortunate Son" in Jonathan Demme's Melvin and Howard (Paul LeMat's Melvin Dumar is the very definition of who John Fogerty was trying to find a voice for, but, for that very reason, Dumar himself wouldn't know the first thing about CCR); the Byrds and the Turtles in Jonathan Kaplan's excellent Heart Like a Wheel (housewife-with-kids Shirley Muldowney's sole connection to music is the country & western her dad used to sing for her; the Byrds and the Turtles come out of Kaplan's life); and GoodFellas (the slow-motion shot of De Niro underneath Cream's "Sunshine of Your Love" gets to the core of Jimmy Conway's spiritual rot like nothing else in the film, even though Jimmy himself couldn't possibly be any more removed from the world inhabited by Cream). The same dynamic is evident in the more recent mastery of Boogie Nights (where Paul Thomas Anderson's porn-happy ensemble essentially has the same relationship to disco that American Graffiti's teenagers have to rock 'n' roll: music's a plaything, an ever-present ambience that fills the space around them and gives them something to dance to, but it's far from the central fact of anybody's life) and Rushmore (Jason Schwartzman's Max Fischer is like one of Pete Townshend's misfit heroes come to life, but Max's own tastes are better represented by the cheesy seduction tape he plays for Ms. Cross than the Who, Kinks, and Creation songs Wes Anderson chose for Rushmore).

In each case, there's a disconnect between the film's characters and its soundtrack, a pattern that reaches its logical conclusion, at once comical and hypnotic, in Lars von Trier's Breaking the Waves. Here, the narrative is literally stopped at various points for a series of static landscape shots underneath a progression of 1970s art-glam songs (David Bowie, Jethro Tull, Roxy Music). I suppose someone could develop a reasonable case for how these songs are intricately linked to the psyches of von Trier's characters, but to me their inclusion is much more easily explained: they're the director's favourite songs, and he was going to get them into his film no matter what. If von Trier had instead been directing The First Wives Club, I'm almost willing to bet that the same soundtrack would have been part of the package.

There are exceptions in these films and others--stray moments when a character reveals a deeper attachment to whatever music's playing in the background, when ownership of the soundtrack passes from director to character. Towards the end of Boogie Nights, in the celebrated firecracker/"Sister Christian" sequence, there's a close-up of Mark Wahlberg's Dirk Diggler as his attention shifts from the surrounding mayhem to the lyrics of Rick Springfield's "Jessie's Girl" from one of Rahad Jackson's "awesome mix tapes." Dirk loses himself in the song, gets caught up in the way Springfield tells the story of Dirk's own feelings for Julianne Moore's Amber Waves, and the trace of a smile starts to cross his face. It's a profound pop-music moment, the best cinematic translation I've ever encountered of an old Steely Dan lyric: "All night long, we sang that stupid song/And every word we sang I knew was true." Anderson went on to give his characters an even greater emotional stake in Magnolia's soundtrack during the great "Wise Up" montage.

Three recent films have appeared that may or may not signal a new kind of pop-music movie, one in which the soundtrack is less in service of a director's personality and is more intimately connected with the thoughts, actions, and aspirations of the film's characters--in short, where characters either talk directly about the music we hear, ruminating on its place in their lives or using it as a sounding board for their theories about the world, or, in one extraordinary instance, consciously choosing soundtrack music that is going to speak for them. The Virgin Suicides, High Fidelity, and American Psycho are very different films in terms of tone and genre, yet their soundtracks all feel like clear departures from the Scorsese/Lucas-influenced style of the past quarter-century.

Mary Harron's American Psycho is the weakest of the three, a heavy-handed art-splatter film whose one idea, that the materialistic excesses of the Reagan era produced monsters in our midst (with Reagan himself, predictably enough, dangled out there as the biggest monster of them all), was handled with more wit and economy in TV's Family Ties. That aside, Harron sticks close to the digressions and detours of Bret Easton Ellis's novel, preserving for us the bizarre juxtaposition of Christian Bale's Patrick Bateman expounding earnestly on the significance of Huey Lewis, Robert Palmer, and Phil Collins just before putting his victims out of their misery in more ways than one. Speaking as someone who worked at a record store during the summer of 1986, Ellis's intuitive grasp of the music which came to define that precise moment in pop history is flawless. Lewis, Palmer, and Collins, along with maybe Lionel Richie and Billy Ocean, are locked into place as surely as Bateman himself--weird, immaculate, anonymous spaces that still linger. Mary Harron's musical voice can be found in I Shot Andy Warhol and old issues of Punk magazine; American Psycho's soundtrack is meticulously and presciently programmed by Bateman, as precise a pop critic as he is serial killer.

Bateman's Top-40 monologues are an opportune time to bring up Quentin Tarantino, whose most famous musical set piece, the Stealer's Wheel scene from Reservoir Dogs, would fit comfortably into American Psycho. Tarantino is something of a bridge between the Scorsese/Lucas tradition and the recent blip of character-driven soundtracks. Unlike Scorsese's hoods, Tarantino's characters reveal an intellectual, if not always emotional, attachment to pop music: observe the Madonna roundtable and Chris Penn's close analysis of "The Night the Lights Went Out in Georgia" in Reservoir Dogs, or Sam Jackson trading thoughts on the Delfonics with Robert Forster in Jackie Brown. In the first two cases, it's hard to hear the talk that accompanies the music as coming from anyone other than Tarantino himself. When Mr. Brown and Mr. Blue start dissecting "Like a Virgin," it's like a great in-joke on the gulf between Jimmy Conway and Cream in GoodFellas--the words are Tarantino's, not Mr. Brown's, and they carry about as much spiritual weight as Homer Simpson wistfully pining for the bygone days of Supertramp. But in Jackie Brown, you really do hear the Delfonics through the ears of Forster and Pam Grier, signalling a move from Tarantino to his characters as the controlling sensibility.

There's probably more talk about pop music in High Fidelity than in any narrative film ever made, much of it lifted verbatim from Nick Hornby's novel. Too much talk, sometimes--after a thrillingly resonant opening, "You're Gonna Miss Me" blaring over a close-up of a spinning 45, the music drops out and John Cusack needlessly starts explaining what the Thirteenth Floor Elevators' monument to spite and self-pity has already made perfectly clear. Far from channeling its characters and its music onto two separate tracks--with the narrative looking after the former and the director in charge of the latter--High Fidelity immerses Cusack and his record-store buddies in the daily rituals, idiosyncrasies, and private enthusiasms that grow out of a full-fledged pop obsession. Sometimes the surfeit of detail works fine: You could see High Fidelity six times and still have fun scanning the frame for familiar album covers, and the one time when the record store's busy and we hop from fragment to fragment of overheard conversation--Stiff Little Fingers, Blonde on Blonde, Psychocandy, the Beta Band--director Stephen Frears lowers the volume on Cusack a bit and lets the film find its own rhythm. In the end, however, the movie has all the surface noise of Hornby's novel without the underlying melancholy.

Sofia Coppola's The Virgin Suicides is pitched far away from High Fidelity's esoteric clutter, but its austerity and restraint are deceptive: no matter how encyclopedic Cusack's pop-music I.Q. is in High Fidelity, or how much his record collection dwarfs the solitary milk crate owned by Kirsten Dunst's Lux in The Virgin Suicides, it's Coppola's film that comes closer to capturing from the inside the experience of what it's like to give part of your life over to pop music--closer, maybe, than any film ever has. In Dazed and Confused, an earlier version of growing up in the '70s, Richard Linklater's teenagers seemed barely cognizant of the Foghat and Edgar Winter that played non-stop on the radio as they drove around town. Linklater had the songs down cold, but I only rarely sensed that any of them meant anything to the kids--whatever feeling of kinship I took away were for Linklater, who clearly shares some biography with me, not for his characters. The Virgin Suicides uses about one-seventh the amount of music heard in Dazed and Confused, but every second registers. Sometimes, like with the incredible introduction of Trip Fontane to Heart's "Magic Man," Coppola sticks close to Scorsese: pick the right song, play it loud and let it play, and let the music do the rest. Even there, though, "Magic Man" pointedly speaks for all the girls hanging off their lockers and swooning as Trip walks down the hall, so when "Crazy on You" accompanies Lux's and Trip's seismic first kiss soon after, it's as if Heart has been officially designated as a talisman to the kids, something that closes off their world to outsiders. From there it's a short step to the homecoming dance, where Electric Light Orchestra's "Strange Magic," 10cc's "I'm Not in Love," and Styx's "Come Sail Away" speak a secret language of longing and desire understood immediately by anyone who went to high school at the time. Which would not, significantly, include Sofia Coppola--I haven't read the source novel for The Virgin Suicides, from which I take it some of the songs are lifted intact, but in any case the music is wholly an extension of the characters, not Coppola (who was five years old at the time).

All of this serves as prelude to the fallout from the dance. First, Mrs. Lisbon's record-burning edict, the first time in the movie one of the daughters is forced to articulate the role that pop music plays in her life. It's important that Mrs. Lisbon's ultimate punishment should target Lux's record collection: as Lux clings to her milk crate to the point of being dragged down the stairs behind it, the same music that has already been established as a binding force among the film's teenagers is now moved into the realm of the purely personal, the realm of the pop obsessive. The sight of a record (any record) going up in flames might not resonate like the sled in Citizen Kane, but to anybody who collects vinyl it's a disturbing image nonetheless. (For a whole gallery of traumatized record collectors, see Alan Zweig's recent documentary Vinyl.)

Finally, there's what I've come to think of as the playing-records-over-the-phone sequence. I'd place it alongside the Copa entrance in GoodFellas (to the Crystals' "Then He Kissed Me"), the pool party in Boogie Nights (Eric Burdon's "Spill the Wine"), and Max's extracurricular resume in Rushmore (the Creation's "Making Time") as the scene against which all pop cinema should be measured. For no apparent reason other than the simple truth that there's nothing one can say that hasn't been said with perfect eloquence somewhere in a pop song, the Lisbon girls and their worshipful chorus of boy admirers renew contact by playing records to each other over the phone. The songs are carefully chosen and a story emerges. The boys lead with Todd Rundgren's "Hello It's Me," a smile and a new beginning; the girls respond with Gilbert O'Sullivan's "Alone Again, Naturally," which talks of suicide. The boys come back with the Bee Gees' "Run to Me," an intimation of safety and acceptance; the girls promptly cut them off with Carole King's "So Far Away," leaving only distance and resignation. I might have extended the scene to find room for Badfinger's "Day After Day" and Harry Nilsson's "Without You," but otherwise, perfection. Coppola takes one of the most basic instincts of pop fandom, the desire to share your obsessions with the world--"Hey, you've got to hear this"--and retells the film in miniature.

Coppola, who like most directors her age has been influenced to one degree or another by music videos, suggests a new kind of synthesis for pop cinema: a combination of Scorsese's dazzle, Lucas' command of period, a complex and carefully developed affinity between character and soundtrack, and something more elusive--an intuitive feel for the kind of atmospherics needed to sustain the best music videos across minutes of wordless narrative. Music and image are melded in The Virgin Suicides in a manner that gives resonance not just to the dynamic high points (where Scorsese and Lucas operate), but also to the quieter, Air-scored passages that give the movie an enigmatic dreaminess befitting the five Lisbon sisters. The scene where the boys read from Cecilia's diary, triggering a fantasy of Lux frolicking in sun-drenched fields underneath Air's "Ce matin la," is video-influenced in the best sense, the sensual elevation of mood and gesture above all else. Coppola's husband, Spike Jonze, is probably the most celebrated video director of the past decade, and her brother Roman directed Green Day's "Walking Contradiction," on the short-list of my favourite videos ever. Clearly Coppola has benefited from some helpful familial ties in terms of drawing on the conventions of video, and she uses them exceedingly well. In doing so, she opens up new possibilities for the pop-music soundtrack.


(Originally published in Cinemascope.)

Monday, March 2, 2026

Avidly, Avidly (2000)

Now that the Jays are quietly and methodically fading from contention in the A.L. East--fitting for a team that more or less faded into contention accidentally--Toronto fans can turn their attention to three individual stories that have been taking shape all year:

1) Tony Batista's attempt to become the first third baseman ever to hit 50 HR. (Possible but unlikely--after a year-plus of a credible Mike Schmidt imitation, Tony finally seems to be slowing down.)

2) David Wells over Pedro Martinez for the Cy Young. (A longshot at the All-Star break, now a dead issue--Pedro has two months to get the 5 or 6 wins that would make him a lock no matter what Wells does.)

3) Carlos Delgado's pursuit of the first Triple Crown since Yastrzemski's in 1967. It took 36 years for somebody to break Maris's home run record; unless there's a Triple Crown winner in the next four seasons, Yaz's milestone will have stood up longer than Maris's.

I'm surprised--compared to something like DiMaggio's streak or Williams's .400 season, a Triple Crown seems relatively manageable. I can't see anybody, under any circumstances (offensive boom year, playing in Coors Field, etc.), hitting in 57 straight games. There's just not enough margin of error--essentially there's none, which is why, 60 years later, nobody's even gotten within 80% of DiMaggio's mark. In abbreviated seasons, George Brett (extended injury) and Tony Gwynn (strike) got about 98% of the way to .400, so that does seem like something that will happen one of these years. But even there, there's not the luxury of a lot of down-time. Delgado, for instance, recently went over two weeks without a home run, but having built up a comfortable lead beforehand, he's still tied for the league lead. A serious two-week slump for somebody chasing .400 (5 for 40, say) would pretty much kill his chances. So even though winning a Triple Crown is something of a juggling act, you can drop one of the balls for a couple of weeks and still recover, especially if nobody else comes along and picks it up while you're not looking (much like nobody went on a home run tear during Delgado's slump).

In any case, Carlos is in the running. To go along with the home run lead, his .368 BA (complete through Aug. 8) leaves him second behind Garciaparra's .386, and his 101 RBI are similarly tied for second behind Edgar Martinez's 107. He should win HR: Griffey's gone, Gonzalez's year is a write-off, and the one guy I'd normally count as even-money to keep up with Carlos, Manny Ramirez, simply lost too much time on the DL. Glaus or Giambi? Maybe, but Delgado is clearly the league's premier home-run hitter right now. Taking the RBI title will be tougher, BA tougher still (where Garciaparra's DL time will work to his advantage). But absolutely, he's still very much in the picture.

By my count, there have been 16 players since '67 who made a legitimate run at a Triple Crown. (Fifteen--Barry Bonds did it twice.) It's an arbitrary call, but "legitimate" for me counts as having finished with no less than 90% of the league-leading mark in all three Triple Crown categories. That's the minimum requirement, but in actual fact, 13 of the 16 players led the league in at least one of the three categories, while seven of the 16--almost half--led in two. Having narrowed the field to 16, I then used the following formula to assign each player an overall "Triple Crown Index" (or, in the parlance of Bachman-Turner Overdrive, "TCI"):

[(BA/BA leader)-squared + (HR/HR leader)-squared + (RBI/RBI leader)-squared]/3

I squared each percentage in order to knock down stragglers in any one category. If you lead the league in something, you get a 1.00 for that category: Delgado scores (33/33) x (33/33) in home runs this year, or 1.00. Yastrzemski's '67 seasons works out like this:

[(.326/.326)(.326/.326) + (44/44)(44/44) + (121/121)(121/121)]/3 = 1.00

In other words, a Triple Crown.

The top 16 since Yaz, plus Delgado:

 

BA

HR

RBI

TCI

D. Allen, '72

0.969

1.000

1.000

0.979

G. Foster, '77

0.947

1.000

1.000

0.965

J. Rice, '78

0.946

1.000

1.000

0.965

M. Schmidt, '81

0.927

1.000

1.000

0.953

D. Bichette, '95

0.924

1.000

1.000

0.951

W. McCovey, '69

0.920

1.000

1.000

0.949

L. Walker, '97

0.984

1.000

0.929

0.943

B. Bonds, '93

0.908

1.000

1.000

0.942

B. Williams, '72

1.000

0.925

0.976

0.936

C. DELGADO, '00

0.953

1.000

0.944

0.933

F. Howard, '68

0.910

1.000

0.972

0.925

G. Sheffield, '92

1.000

0.943

0.917

0.910

B. Bonds, '92

0.942

0.971

0.945

0.908

J. Bagwell, '94

0.934

0.907

1.000

0.898

D. Murphy, '83

0.935

0.900

1.000

0.895

F. Thomas, '94

0.983

0.950

0.902

0.894

A. Belle, '94

0.994

0.900

0.902

0.871

I initially drew up a list based on highest TCI only, but a number of players qualified who won the home run and RBI titles without really coming at all close to the batting crown: Killebrew in '69, Stargell and Jackson in '73, Canseco in '88, and a half-dozen others. In 1973, when Reggie hit .293 to Carew's .350, he fell 31 hits short of a Triple Crown; even though his TCI of 0.900 places him ahead of Bagwell, Thomas, and Belle in '94, realistically he was much farther away from the mark than the latter group.

Securing a batting title is obviously the major stumbling block to winning a Triple Crown. Ten of the 16 players on the above chart (Delgado excluded) finished first in home runs, nine of 16 won RBI, and seven of 16 took both categories. By contrast, only Williams and Sheffield won batting titles. This should not be surprising. In any given year, there are always hitters who are primarily thought of as power guys hanging around the fringes of the batting race, with one or two of them invariably right in the middle; you'll never see players who are first and foremost high-average hitters on the home-run leaderboard. When Boggs opened everybody's eyes with 24 home runs in 1987, he wasn't even halfway to leading the league.

A serious Triple Crown run does, absent any extenuating circumstances, seem to be a guarantee on winning the MVP. Eleven of the players above were MVPs, and four of the five non-winners can be easily explained: Sheffield and Belle lost to rival Triple Crown contenders (Bonds and Thomas), Howard was up against Denny McLain's 31 wins, and the voters were smart enough to realize that Bichette's big season (unlike Walker's '97) was an almost comical Coors Field illusion--.377, 31 HR, 83 RBI, .755 SA at home; .300/9/45/.473 on the road--giving the award to Barry Larkin instead. (I would have voted for Piazza.) Williams lost to Bench in '72, an arguable but reasonable pick. Bench led the league in HR and RBI; he hit .270 when .270 meant something for a catcher; he won a Gold Glove and Williams didn't; the Reds won and the Cubs didn't; and Williams did half his hitting in Wrigley Field, the Coors Field of its day. Incidentally, Williams is the only guy on the above list who technically came within three hits of winning a Triple Crown (Allen needed five), albeit three solo home runs.

So I'm confident that Delgado will be the American League MVP this year. Pedro Martinez, whose season may turn out to be as historic in its way as McLain's '68, is the most credible competition I see, but with Ivan Rodriguez out and Pedro/Nomar, A-Rod/Edgar, and Thomas/Ordonez up against vote- splitting, I think Carlos will win. A Triple Crown, I don't know. He's got a chance--maybe the best since Allen and Williams in '72.

Sunday, March 1, 2026

Mailer, Christgau, and Me (1999 - 2006)

I'll put links to the 11 (or 12) pieces I did for the Village Voice here; all of them were during Chuck Eddy's tenure as editor. I thought for a few minutes that I wouldn't be able to retrieve them; if you go directly to the Voice's web page--still online, still being updated (a long, impossibly messy story that stopped making sense to me years ago)--their archives only go back to 2005 when you search. So all my name turns up is a few Pazz & Jop comments. But if you do a Google search on "phil dellio village voice," you get this:

https://www.villagevoice.com/author/phildellio/

Which in turns leads you to workable links for the 11 published pieces I did for them, plus one lengthier Pazz & Jop comment on 50 Cent & Mobb Deep's "Outta Control." At some point these will disappear too, so I made sure to save the text for everything, to be cut-and-paste here when that happens. Unless I disappear first.

-----------------

Sugar Ray: https://www.villagevoice.com/sugar-ray/

Third Eye Blind: https://www.villagevoice.com/semi-charmed-second-life/

Pop Music in Movies: https://www.villagevoice.com/freeze-frame/

Matchbox 20: https://www.villagevoice.com/pushin-less-hard/

Tragically Hip: https://www.villagevoice.com/wheatfield-gnosticism/

Madonna: https://www.villagevoice.com/act-of-contrition/

Treble Charger: https://www.villagevoice.com/brand-new-record/

Blink 182: https://www.villagevoice.com/whats-my-age-again/

Alanis Morissette: https://www.villagevoice.com/thesaurus-in-my-pocket/

Nashville covers: https://www.villagevoice.com/replacement-party-tonight/

George Harrison: https://www.villagevoice.com/shiva-shiva-yall/

50 Cent/Mobb Deep: https://www.villagevoice.com/boxing-day/

Say Hey (2000)

When I sent a copy of my All-Century ballot to a friend in California last year (complete ballot below), he sent it back with a few notes scribbled down. Next to Alex Rodriguez, my one write-in vote: "Same here, gut pick." Roy Campanella: "No no no. Unless you're counting his Negro League years." (Picking another catcher besides Bench was tough. I wanted to use my only write-in spot for Rodriguez, so that ruled out Piazza or Pudge, both of whom were inexplicably left off the regular ballot. All things being equal, which they weren't when Campanella broke in at the advanced age of 26, Campanella's peak value looks a little better to me than Berra's.) Ted Williams's name was x-ed out: "Can't run, can't catch, can't throw. Not on my fucking team. Bad for morale." (I think the adjective is a reference to Williams's standard batting-cage patter as documented in Ball Four. My friend's objections, and his preference for Musial, are similar to those voiced by Bill James. I don't know: a .634 lifetime slugging average buys a lot of selfishness.) And next to Griffey, "Easy over Mays at this point." I voted for both.

So how does Ken Griffey compare to Willie Mays at this point in their careers? Griffey is about to begin his 12th season; Mays sat out half the '52 season and all of '53 for military service, so a comparable time frame for him covers 1951-1962 (with Mays's half-year cancelled out by Griffey's injury-shortened '95). Through 11 seasons, their at-bats (5,862 for Mays, 5,832 for Griffey) and AB + BB (Mays had 6,586 to Griffey's 6,579) are almost dead even.

In terms of unadjusted numbers, Mays is running ahead in most key categories:

 

AB

H

2B

3B

HR

TB

BB

BA

SA

OBP

RC/27

Mays

5862

1846

302

99

368

3450

724

.315

.589

.390

8.55

Junior

5832

1742

320

30

398

3316

747

.299

.569

.378

7.82

Mays has a slight edge in batting average, slugging average, and on-base percentage, and he creates about 10% more runs per 27 outs (non-stolen base version). Griffey's leading in home runs and home runs per 100 AB by a similar margin. I haven't included their more team-influenced Runs and RBI totals, but if you add the two categories together, it's again a virtual tie (2,219 to 2,215 in favor of Mays).

Those are the raw totals and averages. Once you adjust against league-wide offensive levels, Mays starts to establish clear superiority. While the '50s was by and large a hitter's decade--"get people on base and hit home runs," as characterized by James--obviously the seven-year offensive bonanza that got underway in '93 (during which time Griffey has hit about 80% of his career home runs, mirroring league trends every step of the way) has its only parallel in the early '30s, and maybe not even there. Here are the respective league averages for Mays's and Griffey's first 11 seasons:

 

HR/100 AB

BA

SA

OBP

RC/27

N.L., 1951-62*

2.67

.259

.357

.325

4.44

A.L., 1989-99

2.87

.267

.414

.335

4.84

*('53 excepted)

The differences aren't huge (slugging average is getting there), but across the board, Griffey's numbers have been put up in an era of historically inflated offense. When each player is measured against his league, Mays looks even better:

 

HR/100 AB

BA

SA

OBP

RC/27

Mays

+135.3%

+21.5%

+48.2%

+20.2%

+92.6%

Junior

+138.4%

+11.7% 

+37.2% 

+12.8% 

+61.7%

Mays almost pulls even in home run percentage, and in the other categories he widens the gap. Whatever degree of dominance you attribute to Griffey today, Mays was even more dominant.

Other considerations:

1) SPEED -- I don't use James's slightly more complicated stolen-base version when calculating runs created per 27 outs for the sole reason that I'm lazy. Mays had stolen 240 bases through 1962, with a success rate of 76%; Griffey is currently 167 for 227, a 74% rate. Call it even if you want, based on the assumption that Griffey's totals would be comparable if he felt the need to run (the DiMaggio argument), but it's hard not to go with Mays.

2) DEFENSE-- Gold Gloves were first awarded in 1957: Mays proceeded to win six out of six through '62, including the only one awarded to an N.L. out- fielder in '57 (the A.L. gave out the normal three that year). Griffey has won 10 of 11, missing out only in his rookie year. In Palmer and Thorn's Total Baseball, Griffey is credited with 83 "fielding runs" through 1998 (I don't have figures for '99); through Mays's first 10 seasons, he gets credit for 126. I don't have the slightest clue how to calculate fielding runs, or how significant Mays's lead is; by way of comparison, Clemente totalled 99 fielding runs through his first 10 seasons. In any case, the evidence is again on the side of Mays. And if you love the Vic Wertz clip as much as I do, so is romance.

3) MVP HISTORY -- Mays won once (and would win again in '65), so has Griffey. Calculating total votes as a percentage of votes cast (what James calls "MVP share"), Mays had received a 4.19% share through '62, while Griffey stands at 3.20% thus far. With the player pool much larger now, basically this one's a wash.

4) TEAM SUCCESS -- In an eight-team league, the Giants won the Series in '54, the pennant in '51 (with Willie in the on-deck circle when the world stood still) and '62. In a 14-team league, the Mariners won divisional titles in '95 and '97. However you weight the points, edge to Mays.

5) NICKNAME -- "Junior"'s plain but good; "The Say Hey Kid" is a work of art, and it also inspired one of my e-mail addresses.

With numbers being easy to juggle around until they say what you want them to say, I know that someone could put together a credible case for Griffey. (Just as a league-weighted case could be made for Grove over Koufax, Yount over Rodriguez, or other configurations different than my own.) Again, I voted for both of them. But I don't think you can make any kind of a case that Griffey is the clear or obvious choice. By the time he retires, maybe. Mays only had four really first-rate seasons left after '62 (including '65, one of his greatest), at which point age and the offensive free-fall of the late '60s caught up with him. Hopefully Griffey will be retired with the home-run record before he experiences anything similar to Mays's inglorious exit with the Mets at the age of 42. For now, though, I'd take Mays.


My All-Century Ballot (starters listed first):

Catcher: Bench, Campanella
First Base: Gehrig, McGwire
Second Base: Robinson, Hornsby
Third Base: Schmidt, Brett
Shortstop: Wagner, Rodriguez
Outfield: Ruth, Mays, Williams, DiMaggio, Musial, Mantle, Henderson, Bonds, Griffey
Pitcher: Maddux (RHP), Koufax (LHP), Johnson, Mathewson, Grove, Clemens
Manager: Stengel
Mascot: Joe Schultz